Chalkhills, Number 254 The `Thanks for Christmas' Issue Tuesday, 22 December 1992 Today's Topics: opinion wanted Fischer-Z re-rebuttal Three Wise Men various fanatical audio observations
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] From: mccune@wpi.wpi.edu (Jesse Brook McCune) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 19:34:43 -0500 Subject: opinion wanted I am considering buying "The Singles 78-85"...opinions on this album?...is the CD worth $20?...thanks -jesse mccune mccune@wpi.wpi.edu *email me please*
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] From: hvgtw!dhgpa!adkoning@hvlpa.att.com Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 09:23 MET Subject: Fischer-Z Here's yet another artist who talks about XTC in the dutch magazine OOR. An excerpt of an interview with John Watts of Fischer-Z, by Oene Kummer: [...] [Oene:] The song _Mockingbird Again_ [from the new album _Destination Paradise_] could have been written by Andy Partridge, the _Mayor Of Simpleton_ from XTC. Watts nods confirmingly. 'Andy and I have the same background. Most bands from the new wave came from the big city, but we came >from the _countryside_ west of London. He from Swindon, I from the neighbourhood of Reading. My accent has changed because I went to school in London, but our way of singing is the same. There was a background vocal on _Mockingbird Again_ that we left out because it sounded too much like XTC.' [...] The same issue of OOR (nmbr 24) has the unconfirmed 'news' that Andy will do production for the new Blur album. It also has an article about the CD-single _Say No To XTC_ by C.I.P., which is (you guessed it) about and against the drug. It is part of a big campaign against illegal house-parties and drug abuse. I haven't heard it. Maybe it's interesting for the XTC-Discography (and thus needed material for the XTC-completists)? An early Merry Xmas from Andre de Koning, broadcasting live from Holland.
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] From: melinda@world.std.com (Melinda M Hale) Subject: re-rebuttal Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 22:49:59 EST Geez, I don't want to have everyone on my case. I admit that maybe I was a little perturbed when I first brought up this "whining" thing, because I had just seen the same argument on the Elvis Costello list. There's nothing wrong with an opinion, and I certainly don't categorically accept every single thing XTC does or says, but there's a difference between voicing an opinion, perhaps comparing works, etc., and making blanket statements about various musicians being not as good as they once were. This just rubs me the wrong way; it makes me think, "clearly this person doesn't feel that way, else s/he would not spend time on this list or money on XTC media." Al, all I meant with the "tape" suggestion, was that XTC are still better musicians and songwriters than I, or than any of my friends who have professional bands. That doesn't mean that I cannot recognize their musicianship and songwriting as good or bad; I can. I just thought the trashing that was going on was getting a little self-righteous (I said a *little*!) Steve, I agree that I tired of O&L and NONSUCH more quickly than BLACK SEA or ENGLISH SETTLEMENT -- I heard a guitar riff on ES just last year that I couldn't remember having heard before. I think this has to do an awful lot with what Jim was saying about production styles, i.e. big-open-room ambience vs. slick digital layers. It seems that a lot of albums these days, not just XTC, have this "let's show how precise CDs are" production sound, and I have mixed feelings about it. Crispness is one of the great things about "Poor Skeleton Steps Out", but the delicate power of "Towers of London" never ceases to blow me away. BIG EXPRESS is sort of somewhere in-between. I dunno. Mea maxima culpa, y'all. Melinda Hale "What a waste of breath it is, searching for the jobs that don't exist..."
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 07:23:15 PST From: Wes Wilson @PKO3 - 223-3413 22-Dec-1992 1019 <wilson@pharos.enet.dec.com> Subject: Three Wise Men To the Three Wise Men of Music - Andy, Dave, and Colin: Thanks for Christmas! and Holiday Greetings also to Chalkhillians who girdle the globe! Wes Wilson Massachusetts, USA
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] Subject: various fanatical audio observations Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 13:44:29 EST From: Tobin Munsat <Tobin.Munsat@lambada.oit.unc.edu> OK- I've got three things that I thought might be worth mentioning to Chalkhills. The dumbest one first: Try listening to Season Cycle, imagining that Queen is doing the backup singing, especially during the bridge. I know this sounds ridiculous, but the harmonies that they are singing (again- especially at the bridge) sound just like Queen! Ok, now for something a little (a very little) more substantial: Remember how Ballet For a Rainy Day starts "Orange and Lemon..." indicating their next album title? Now listen to Chalkhills and Children, at 1:24, and see if you think any particular word is sung a little louder than the rest. (Please respond if you agree or think I'm nuts) Lastly, I found a little subtlety in the breaks of Sacrificial Bonfire (at 2:57 and 3:05, not the breaks with the crackling fire). If you turn the volume way up there you can hear what sounds like someone dropping their bow on their cello, and then some tempo counting (in the string section, I guess). Fanatical, I agree; but pretty cool to find something new in an album that I've heard 500 times. -Tobin
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] Thanks to Ira Rosenblatt. Happy Holidays to everyone on Chalkhills! At the nether end of 1992 we are 360 strong, which is to say that there are at least 360 readers of Chalkhills this world over. For all administrative issues, such as change of address, withdrawal from the list, fan club addresses, discography requests (last update 2 December), back issues, FAQ list, etc., send a message to the following address: <chalkhills-request@chalkhills.org> The Chalkhills archives are available at "http://chalkhills.org/". All views expressed in Chalkhills are those of the individual contributors only. Thanks for all the love and happiness.
Go back to Volume 1.
17 October 1997 / Feedback