Chalkhills, Number 367 Friday, 5 August 1994 Today's Topics: Re: Hello Chalkhills Re: Chalkhills #366 Andy and Despair (Being and Nothingness) Info about me etc. Re: Chalkhills #366 Barry Andrew's Delicate Touch Intros and all that jazz Re: The Greatest Living Englishman RagnBone buffet insert AnDy Interview... Through the Hill The Greatest Living Englishman Some Thoughts On G.L.E.
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] From: ALIZAN@aol.com Date: Thu, 04 Aug 94 14:43:03 EDT Subject: Re: Hello Chalkhills Also being new to the list, it was great to read Paul Vincent's recollections of 'discovering XTC" back when on U.K.'s Old Grey Whistle Test. I've recently seen the clips...it certainly is great. For me, I suppose the crucial event had to be seeing XTC live at Hurrah in NYC, during the Drums & Wires tour. Amazing....If anyone can share any tales of that tour, it would make for interesting reading for all. Bill
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] Date: 4 Aug 1994 11:54:52 -0800 From: "Steve Krause" <Steve_Krause@qm.sri.com> Subject: Re: Chalkhills #366 > Are you and I the only ones on this list who actually liked > Barry's playing? Another vote, pro-Andrews. I think some of the anti-Andrews sentiment stems from people grafting his style onto the values of latter-day XTC--"I can barely imagine what he'd have done to English Settlement; glad they got rid of that bloke." To my mind, Andrews' playing fit in with the way XTC was for the first two albums. If you look at his further work in Shriekback, you'll see quite a bit of evolution away from the wacky-organ bit. He would have been an interesting factor in some of XTC's later stuff. And even his songwriting improved greatly over time (which shouldn't have been too hard, given the baseline was his abysmal Go2 contributions). I still think Barry Andrews reuniting with XTC for some cuts would add interesting tension to the mix. Dave Gregory is an eminently tasteful guitarist and keyboard player, but something remains to be said for measured dosages of Andrews' more subservise tendencies. --Steve
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] Date: Thu, 04 Aug 1994 17:05:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "it says `Two Eggs, ANY Style'..." <MELINDA@delphi.com> Subject: Andy and Despair (Being and Nothingness) Marshall V Pierce says: > First, I can't agree with Melinda's statement that "hopelessness" or, p'raps > more accurately, "negativeness" is not a re-occurring theme. Of course, if > Melinda was being even a bit sarcastic, then I've put my foot in it and you > have my apologies. No, I wasn't being sarcastic. Maybe I said this to someone in private e-mail, and not here to Chalkhills, I don't remember, but I'll say it again, just in case... One of the things I love about Andy (XTC in general, but Andy especially) is that he is able to write stuff that is biting, angry, intelligent, political -- without being...hm, I don't know how to put it. I find his stuff to be very multi-dimensional and realistic because he doesn't *just* gripe or *just* sing happy pop songs. He does both, and what makes him have such substance is that he really believes the stuff he says. Sure, he's able to be angry, he's able to show frustration -- but there's a difference between anger and despair. *sigh* I don't think I'm doing a very good job of explaining this... Think of "Beating of Hearts", since in the last issue of Chalkhills we got to see that old interview in which Andy says he likes the lyrics and believes every word. Someone who writes that song, or even more specific ones like "Jump" or "Knuckle Down" does not believe in despair/ hopelessness. I want to stress that I like "Travels In Nihilon". I suppose one could chalk it up to immaturity, "angry young sod" sort of stuff. That's sort of how I see "Complicated Game", too, which is another despair song (and yes, I like that one, too). Am I making any sense at ALL?? :-) Melinda
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] Date: Thu, 07 Jul 1994 00:20:55 GMT From: Ashley@apowell.demon.co.uk (Ashley Powell) Subject: Info about me etc. Me -- I must confess that I have not been an XTC fan for very long. One of my friends had a few records, but I'd never really heard them. Then, shortly after its release, I saw a cheap copy of Nonesuch on CD and bought it for my friend. Unfortunately he had bought it himself in the couple of days since I had seen him, so, not wanting to waste a few quid, I decided to listen. Since then I have more or less worked my way backwards with the previous albums. To be perfectly honest my main reason for wanting to join this mailing list is simply for information, rather than any deep and meaningful discussion about the music. Music is there to be heard, not pulled apart, and the best experiences to be gleaned from any music are either public (i.e. live performance) or personal: I've been to some bloody good concerts in my time, but you really had to be there, and if I were to compile a list of my all-time top ten songs I think "Holly up on Poppy" and "Wrapped in Grey" would be there quite close to the top, but I couldn't really say why. That's not to say I haven't got anything to say, I just hope I don't start reading meaningless twaddle about how Andy Partridge is a "poet", and how much better Skylarking would have been if Dear God had been on it. What I really want to know is; do XTC still exist? Does the Budd/Partridge album mean that they are no more? If they _are_ no more, what are Moulding and Gregory doing (they've always wanted to tour again, so are they?). If they are all still together, what new stuff is in the offing? Are there any obscure facts that I ought to be aware of? Okay, so I could get the Little Express fanzine sent etc., but I only subcribed to Internet access a week ago so the novelty won't wear off for a while yet. Besides which, you always know you're up to date, and the grapevine branches out much faster on the net. Chalkhills ---------- I heard about Chalkhills from a one of the cheaper overpriced books about the internet, "The Internet Resource Quick Reference", ISBN 1-56529-748-2, published by Que (it cost £16.45p sterling - cheap considering that most others range from between 25-40 Quid!). This is actually the first mailing list I have ever tried to contact, and was pleasantly surprised to discover that it had actually worked (and so quick too!). The next list I tried was for Jethro Tull (jtull@remus.rutgers.edu) but have had no reply as yet. Lists for which I can find no refence but which _surely_ must exist are things like Thomas Dolby, Joe Jackson, David Sylvian, Talk Talk, etc. Any info anyone may have on such lists would be appreciated. More Me ------- One final point: I compose a lot of my own music, primarily on a computer through lack of technical ability on any instrument, and am always on the look out for interesting samples. As most people's ideas of a good sample revolve around how many times you can fit an echoing voice shouting meaningless crap into a twenty minute dance mix, I would expect XTC fans to be a tad more discerning. Therefore if anyone can so direct me I would be grateful. Well, that will do as an introduction. I look forward to many bulging wallets overstuffed with useful info.
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] Date: Thu, 04 Aug 94 23:12:30 EDT From: Eric Wagner <BI599110@brownvm.brown.edu> Subject: Re: Chalkhills #366 Barry's playing was generally pretty lame in XTC, but he got a bit better in Shriekback. Anybody agree?
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] From: Fred_M_Hamilton@cup.portal.com Subject: Barry Andrew's Delicate Touch Date: Thu, 4 Aug 94 21:02:18 PDT Jim McGowan asks (responding to a comment from Paul Vincent): >Are you and I the only ones on this list who actually liked Barry's playing? Hell no! One of the things I love best about XTC is their sense of humor-not just lyrically, but musically as well. Sometimes they come up with a riff or a little guitar fill that just cracks me up! One of my favorite (and most minimalist) examples of this has always been the middle part of "Meccanic Dancing"-the part right after "I feel like a giant tonight!" After a few bars of the creshendo, Barry decides it's just not quite dissonant enough and tosses in the final clinching note to propel the song just over the top. I love that stuff! Listening to it now-the entire Go 2 album is full of great organ bits! The cheesy organ fills between the lyrics of Meccanic Dancing make me smile every time. The entire song "Jumping in Gomorrah", from concept to every detail of its execution, simply slays me. There are a lot of gems on this oft-underappreciated album. That said, I must add that Go 2 is no more my favorite XTC album than any other. I'm not a big fan of rating albums-I find that my favorite XTC album is whichever one I'm in the mood for at the time. The band's kept its sense of humor throughout all its later albums, but nothing brings as big a smile to my face as this album. Other albums bring other pleasures. If any of you other Chalkhillians out there enjoy music with a sense of humor like I've been talking about, I'd urge you to locate any music you can find by James White and the Contortions, aka James White and the Blacks. Hilarious stuff! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fred Hamilton fred_m_hamilton@cup.portal.com
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] From: kiwi@sage.cc.purdue.edu (-==Kiwi==-) Subject: Intros and all that jazz Date: Thu, 4 Aug 94 23:04:49 EST I recently subscribed to this list and I have a question: How old are the majority of you? I'm under the impression that I'm about the youngest one on here. I'm only 18. I first heard of XTC when I saw "Peter Pumpkin Head" on The Box. I thought it was an amazing video so I went out and bought Nonsuch. I'm waiting to get 25 O'Clock from the record store. I can't wait. Oh, to but the age thing in perspective, how old were you when Drums and Wires came out(1979)? I was 4 years old. It was wierd to listen to Drums and Wires. I mean, I'm so used to listening to Nonsuch and Lemons and Oranges it's gonna take a while to get used to that British/New Wavish/Punk sound of the cd. It is good though. That's basically it, + Steve -- Boycott .sigs
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] From: adkoning@hvsag01.att.com (Andre A M De Koning +31 35 87 4927) Date: Fri, 5 Aug 94 11:05:46 +0200 Subject: Re: The Greatest Living Englishman Curtiss Hammock (CurtissH@aol.com) wrote about The Martin Newell CD: >The songs are all very 60s, with great vocal harmonies. The music is quite >beautiful, and often haunting, with some fine arrangements by Mr. Partridge. I bought it two days ago (I finally went ahead and gave my birthday money the only correct destination), took it with me to work yesterday and slided it into my portable CD player when I got into the bus. Wow! I have never been smiling so much on my way to work!! Each Song Is Great. One almosts forgets that the drums sound cheesy a lot of times. Which made me think of this: if Andy's talk about using no drums on the new XTC record will lead to anything near the quality of the arrangement for 'Before the Hurricane', I will be a very happy person. I can eat plates full of that stuff (as long as the 'desert' will be something in a 'Funk Pop a Roll' style . . . >;-). No, I won't wait until my next birtday with buying the Budd/Andy collaboration, the shop just ran out of it (which, come to think of it, is a good sign for something with Andy's name on it!). , -- Andre de Koning
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] Date: Fri, 5 Aug 94 12:26 BST-1 From: joeo@cix.compulink.co.uk (Psion plc Joe Odukoya) Subject: RagnBone buffet insert Dear All I have tried lots of different ways of trying to print this with no success is there any kind soul who would be prepared to print me off a copy which I could then photocopy and distribute amongst five hungry XTC fans that I know. Contact me direct and I will provide my snail-mail address. Thanking you profusely in anticipation, - Joeo -
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] Subject: AnDy Interview... Date: Fri, 05 Aug 94 09:44:39 -0400 From: silva@mond1.ccrc.uga.edu As promised here's the transcript (albeit a partial one..) of my recent chat with Andy. I should have the rest of it done and posted soon. EnJoY... JoE "listening/loving Mummur at the moment..." Silva QRM: Did you know much of Harold's work beforehand? AP: Not a great deal, no. He was a rather romantic kind of shadowy figure that played the odd chord with a lot of space in between. The stuff of his that I'd heard, I liked the mixture of this pure meditation coming-at-ya thing and the audacity of it. I'd had a few things of his and I'd heard a few things of his. I don't have many records. I used to have quite a few vinyl albums, but a few years ago I just gave all my vinyl collection away one day because I wasn't playing them and now I don't have tha many records. But I'd heard quite a few things of Harold's. In fact a year before we got together, there was a documentary about the fun parks on Coney Island which was made by an American company and being shown in Britain. I was getting ready to go somewhere in the evening and was looking round the door and thought "Oh, that's really nice music in this documentary." not knowing it was Harold. And then they played a piece of music and I thought "I know that. Oh my God, it's a piece of mine!" They'd lifted "Frost Circus" which is one of the "Homo Safari" series and put it in there. And a little while earlier in the States, Harold had seen the same documentary and obviously he recognized his own music, but quite like the other music in there which was mine. So it was sort of out of coincidence that we both got to see that film with our music in it and liking the other person music, not particularly knowing who it was at the time. QRM: Is he particularly known in ambient circles? AP: I suppose he's got to be one of the top three in that neck of the woods. And I know that he doesn't necessarily like the gentle ghetto expression of "ambient." And he'll positively claw your eyes out if you say the words "New Age." Yeah, I would say he possibly one of the top three along wit Brian Eno, and who else.... QRM: Kitaro? AP: Yeah, um...my God, Kitaro's offensive...I don't know why. I just don't like what he does. One doesn't need to necessarily have a name on that stuff, it's just here's track number 145 and we'll have track 146 in a minute. Kind of Orwellian...It's probably a good approach. QRM: So you didn't listen to any ambient music to get yourself primed for this project? AP: His record company All Saints sent me a couple of his CDs to listen to, which to be truthful, put me off initially because I thought this is perfect as it is, there is nothing I can contribute to this. It really was. It just existed. One was "Music For Three Pianos" and another was "The White Arcade" and just before we started our record they sent "The Dawn's Early Light" which I liked the most because I liked the poetry stuff on there. Then actually meeting Harold and suggesting that we improvise together and seeing if the marriage is going to work, and he did very well. We were giving each other goose bumps up and down the back of the neck all afternoon. And so it was obvious it was going to work and my early fears were unfounded. But initially I was put off because his music has this framework, kind of like a swiss cheese..all held together with holes and I was kind of fearful of treading in those holes and spoiling the whole delicate weave. QRM: I thought it was interesting that a lot of the solo material you've released isn't really noodling on sythesizers, or anything like that. AP: There was a branch in the earlier XTC career which I was very interested in following and did follow for a while. It was a branch shaped like the Dub records I did or the Homo Safari experients or odd bits and pieces that were usually studio down time or cheap studio time and they were experimetns. There was no pressure for it to be a song. But that kind of branch seemed to wither and die off in me as I got more and more seduced by song writing and rather strict structuring, which is kind of what I'm known for I guess - the very structured, clockwork, mechanical toy kind of song. The trinket as it were. I've wanted to make a longer record of that kind of stuff, so for me it was a nice journey, out and about into what I thought had died off. QRM: You'll probably contradict me, but having been a musician myself, isn't it to sort of easy to noodle about on a synthesizer, give it an interesting title and call it "ambient?" How do you juxtapose that with what you and Horld wound up with? AP; Yes, you're right. It is easy. Where somebody else is involved..and we're both picky people, we're both very exacting in what will do and what won't do...uh, the tough element is that it all came from improvisation. And if it didn't work then it was binned, or it was erased, or we just didn't follow that line along anymore. And we threw away about a third of the stuff that we recorded that just wasn't happening. And aborted other countless other things that weren't happening. I mean, we'd just come in each morning over a two week period and just improvise. Sometimes [we'd have] a springboard theme, a little motif like "dum dum da dee dum" or it would be just a chord change. That would be the initial springboard. And we'd improvise and if it didn't work we'd take a break and wipe that and go back or change over instrumentation and try something different. The tough thing I think is making the improvisation...in fact you don't make an improvisation...you make something that "is" an improvisation and if it works, you get that wonderful glow and you know you're making some sort of alchemy. It's a totally different feeling to writing a song. QRM: Did you ever feel like you were treading n uncertain territory at times? AP: My only trepidation would be, and again, has totally dissapated, that certain critics would say that "Aha! You're merely jumping on some ambient bandwagon!" Not that that would hurt me, bacause as I did say, we did have a branch of experimental, purely musical things early on in the XTC career. For me that was just a return to that sort of feel. QRM: How about the instrumentation? Did you sort of leap right in and say that you were going to play guitar here and there? AP: The only constants seemed to be that Harold never played the guitar and I never narrated the poetry. Otherwise we just took whatever was around. I would sit at a hammond, he would sit next to me on a grand and we'd play. And that might work out and then Harold might say "Well we need a bell there..." and I might say "We need to highlight the top line on the last piece..." so we'd overdub maybe a synth or something that picked out the high line. Or Harold might come in one morning and say "I've got these shakers and rattles and I'm going to shake these..." and I might sit at a synthesizer. And in the afternoon, I'd maybe pick up a guitar and he'd go back to sit on the piano. Or we'd have a poem that he would narrate and then the pair of us would sit at synthesizers. It was wherever you cast your eye literally, and largely just running on the gut feeling that acertain something needed. If we were either working on a title like "Okay we're going to play 'Through The Hill' now..." It doesn't exist but we're going to play it and then you'd literally just play your hunch. You would sit down and say "What is this about? I'm sitting down and designing a picture in my head that's hopefully not a million miles away from the picture in Harold's head. If I play the picture in my head and he play's the picture in his, we should get this sort of stereoscopic image working somehow." And sometimes we'd play to a title we already har and sometimes we'd play with a sensation like "This piece of music we're going to make this morning...let's go for a really vast sounding piece that you can fly above and see it sort of five miles below you in all it's detail and it's slipping away as your hovering over it this thing." or "Let's make a piece of music that's so tiny that all the glinting facets of it, all the little details, are worn smooth." We'd talk endlessly about what we were doing which helps a great deal, becasue that was the equivalent of writing the music out, we spoke. Sometimes we just played to a sound until it pulled us toward a title that existed or it pulled us to a feeling that we'd had and didn't know how to dress it.
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] From: joe.kopera@cynosure.clark.net (Joe Kopera) Subject: Through the Hill Date: Thu, 4 Aug 1994 23:22:00 GMT Organization: Cynosure Online - 410-781-6271 Was muddling around in a lcoal Music store today and, while looking through the XtC Almbums..I came across "Through the Hill"..by Andy Partridge, which (it says on the back) was just released. What is this? I've never heard of this before. (I just joined this list) Could someone please explain to me? I should've bought it, but, <sigh>...no funds... .------------------. .-------------------------------------. | Joe Kopera | | If You Don't see the Fnords, | .---. | Disgruntled Teen | | They can't eat you... | | X | | Baltimore, MD | | =p =0 =I =] =B) | `---` `------------------` `-------------------------------------`
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] Date: Fri, 05 Aug 94 16:04:57 MDT From: RussSchroader@dswi.com (Russell Schroader) Subject: The Greatest Living Englishman In the new issue of Rolling Stone (RS 689), the critics review the new album by Martin Newell and Andy Partridge, giving it three and a half stars. The only problem is, to buy it, you have to call Pipeline Records at (516)681-2125. Ask for Lulu when you call and she'll work everything out for you. Tell her Russ from the Internet told you about it. (No, I don't get anything for it. When I called to order my copy, I talked to her for a while and she seemed really cool.) Happy listening.
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] From: KyleSk@aol.com Date: Fri, 05 Aug 94 19:14:22 EDT Subject: Some Thoughts On G.L.E. Howdy, all I've been too lazy to type, but this message prompted me into action: <<Has anyone heard the album "The Greatest Living Englishman" by Martin Newell?>> I have obtained a copy of it, and I'm not as pleased as Mr. Hammock. The album's weaknesses backup what I've been saying all along about Andy's weaknesses--his production and his "use" of a drum programming machine. I like Martin Newell's songwriting. There are times when it rises above the production. And, OK, I like everything about "Before the Hurricane" and "The Greatest Living Englishman" The beauty of being prolific is that you're bound to hit the mark sometimes. But I digress. The drumming in "Good-bye Dreaming Fields" (or something like that) sounds is just plain amateurish. Specifically, in the chorus, when the offbeat is emphasized, sounds as if the whole backup band is working against the singer. It hesitates too much, too obviously. And, at it's worst, is the final song, whose title escapes me at the moment. The drum programming in this post-Beatles instrumental, sounds like a drummer and his drum kit was kicked down a flight of stairs, where he meant to do a drum roll. As for production overall, the dynamic range and tonality are remarkably flat. I find myself searching for the EQ knob that my car radio doesn't have. The point is best made this way. I have G.L.E. on one side, and the latest Elvis Costello outing on the other. When I finish listening to the EC side, I simply rewind. After about a dozen listens, I have no interest in the G.L.E. side. I feared that this "New, improved" Andy would take over the production and drumming reins of XTC as well. The post I read, where XTC was going to be working on much less on a drum-oriented arrangement, is encouraging news. Andy is one of this generation's best composers. Why can't he focus on that? Yea, of course he's free to do what he wants. We're all better for it, anyway. However, I speculate that his production wishes is just some bizarre self-destructive habit. Kyle Skrinak
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] John Relph is on vacation next week, so please be patient. To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to: <chalkhills-request@chalkhills.org> For all other administrative issues, send a message to: <chalkhills-request@chalkhills.org> The Chalkhills archives were once available using FTP from "net.bio.net". The Chalkhills home page is available at "http://chalkhills.org/". The views expressed herein are those of the individual authors. So we can fly away -- bungalow.
Go back to Volume 1.
6 August 1994 / Feedback