Chalkhills, Number 41 Thursday, 13 July 1989 Today's Topics: Re: Chalkhills #40 The Loving Studio vs. Live
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] Date: Wed, 12 Jul 89 22:04:15 EDT From: glickman%hustat@harvard.harvard.edu (Mark Glickman) Subject: Re: Chalkhills #40 jsd@umass writes: > I would also like to tell off Karl MacRae for being a befuddled person. > Any child can tell you that hearing Andy's voice cracking horribly while > he attempts to "bluesy"-up a song, to the accompaniment of a mere three > acoustic guitars has to be one of the worst tortures on the planet. And I, in turn, would like to tell you off. To me, it sounds like you are listening only for mistakes in XTC's live performances. Why should it be so painful to listen to Andy to sing falsetto? > Maybe if you're tone deaf you might like > the other performances better, but I apparently am cursed with relative > pitch (which means a lifetime of putting up with badly calibrated cassette > decks among other things) and it is physically painful for me to hear > bum notes. I, too, have perfect pitch (and experience the same awkwardness of listening to music played in different keys), but hearing a live performance of XTC on MTV doesn't bother me as it does you. It seems that you are listening to their performances at a very localized level. You are listening for note mistakes. I was very impressed with the adaptation of the "Scarecrow People" for acoustic guitars. The arrangement of the song for a live performance was very impressive. The execution of the song was fine if you aren't so attached to individual notes or moments. Live music is understood to be more spontaneous than that, and more prone to mistakes. > You people should stop ragging on "studio" productions. I agree with this, however. The studio versions of songs are the foundations from which live performances evolve. They can be imitated, as XTC seems to do with their live performances, or not, as Joe Jackson often does. I personally would have hoped for XTC to play different arrangements of their songs when they had been performing live. Probably too much effort to do so, and considering that they do not have a very large audience in the U.S., they would confuse an awful lot of folks by playing their big hits (?!) in a different arrangement. - Mark
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] From: toby <toby@hce.computer-science.manchester.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 89 16:36:44 BST Subject: The Loving I had a go at the basic changes for `The Loving'. Any comments? Does anyone have `Funk-pop-a-roll'? Or `Love on a farmboy's wages?' Intro: C Em Ebdim Bb A Verse: D F#m Bm A G A All around the world, every boy and every girl need the Loving Bridge 1: C Em This thing that we need most of Bb G That stuff we should try before we die C Em Everyone is begging to be loved Ebdim G With a free gift a working heart inside Bridge 2: A7 G The Loving's coming Toby
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] From: sco!stewarte@ucscc.ucsc.edu Subject: Studio vs. Live Date: Thu Jul 13 12:26:25 1989 Jon Drukman sez: >Anyway, I digress. You people should stop ragging on "studio" productions. >Can you imagine "Mayor Of Simpleton" without that wonderful digital delay >lock-on on the word "act"? Git outta here! This must be intended facetiously, right? That ridiculous piece of throwaway production ("hey, this song isn't produced enough yet... let's do something to it" I imagine Mr. Fox saying) is the single mar on an otherwise flawless pop single. As for the live version of "Scarecrow People", I can't comment, because I mis-programmed my brother's VCR, with the result that it stopped about 30 seconds into the clip during Andy's last night of "Post-Modern MTV". (I wonder if the hosts have any control over what gets played? Someone was exhibiting some great taste...Robyn Hitchock and Elvis back-to-back... but I, too digress). I also missed the first two nights through not hearing about it in time. If anyone has the week's PostMod on tape (VHS; but that's assumed these days, isn't it?), I'd love to get a copy... -- Stewart (uunet!sco!stewarte or stewarte@sco.com) [ Chalkhills would also like to get a copy, if only for the soundtrack, to be included in the Radio Shows tape. If anyone has this, please let me know. -- John]
[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][] For all administrative issues, such as change of address, withdrawal from the list, discography requests, back issues, etc., send a message to the following address: <chalkhills-request@chalkhills.org> The views expressed in Chalkhills are those of the individual authors only.
Go back to Volume 1.
13 July 1989 / Feedback