Chalkhills Digest, Volume 5, Number 186 Thursday, 29 April 1999 Today's Topics: Behind Her Bonnet Darn...No Dame Fortune on AV2 Spaghetti Junction In London there is also... Re: Nonsuch Sucks? No Way! Coucou le revoilou Other Albums Partridge Power Re: Bloody Boys In Blue matt kaden Gregsy's business with the other Two? Re: The Last Hurrah Re: Are You Being Served? Re: An observation Re: Little Boy Blue Tabla and the Time Passages! TV's glory days Administrivia: To UNSUBSCRIBE from the Chalkhills mailing list, send a message to <chalkhills-request@chalkhills.org> with the following command: unsubscribe For all other administrative issues, send a message to: <chalkhills-request@chalkhills.org> Please remember to send your Chalkhills postings to: <chalkhills@chalkhills.org> World Wide Web: <http://chalkhills.org/> The views expressed herein are those of the individual authors. Chalkhills is compiled with Digest 3.7 (John Relph <relph@sgi.com>). I don't want to let love spoil the day again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 28 Apr 99 09:45:33 AES From: Paul.Culnane@dcita.gov.au Subject: Behind Her Bonnet Message-ID: <0000amouaaum.0000zvlvrdtv@dcita.gov.au> There seems to be some kind of artwork behind the disc tray on the Easter Theatre digipak. Has anybody taken the plunge to steam the plastic tray off to find out what's underneath? Or does anybody know what's underneath anyway? Obviously, I don't want to risk finding out with my copy! ~p@ul
------------------------------ From: WWi8064839@aol.com Message-ID: <700f86ee.2457b2fa@aol.com> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 20:40:26 EDT Subject: Darn...No Dame Fortune on AV2 I was just looking at the Chalkhills discography. It's a shame that "Dame Fortune" isn't slated to be on AV, Volume 2. A great track! One of Andy's best demos. Oh well. Yes, melt the guns. All of them! Wes Wilson (blissfully listening to the new Bunnymen album...:-) )
------------------------------ Message-ID: <37265F9D.9ABDBE0B@zoo.co.uk> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 02:08:48 +0100 From: John Peacock <johndrewp@zoo.co.uk> Subject: Spaghetti Junction John Gardner wrote: > So for me, no amount of american roundabouts, which there are quite a > few, and many in the suburbs of Chicago, believe it or not, can frustrate > me, CUZ I SURVIVED THE SPAGHETTI ROUNDABOUT! Or more properly, Spaghetti Junction. I imagine the designers of that thing stayed up very very late, giggling. "Go on, Derek, put another bit on, I dare you." So he does, and they all collapse in peals of laughter, pledging to only take the train to Birmingham, or better yet avoid the Midlands altogether. And there's always the fear that you might stray onto a bit that has entrances, but no exits, and spend the rest of your life just going round and round and round and... Of course, as a non-driving passenger I can have these cheerful thoughts, and express them freely while the driver is trying to work out where the hell the exit is. J
------------------------------ Message-ID: <19990428004345.25284.rocketmail@web1.rocketmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 17:43:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Cheryl <cxtc@rocketmail.com> Subject: In London there is also... Hey there Our dearly beloved Richard P-A recounted: >In London there is also a Green Dragon, Dog & >Dumplings, Moon Under Water, Spread Eagle, Flower >Pot, Perseverance, Case Is Altered, Seven Balls, >Bitter Experience, Charcoal Burner, Old Shades, >Surprise, Pied Bull, Newt & Ferret, Bun Shop and >Monkey Puzzle... and hopefully that exhausts any >"Whacky Pub Name" thread but certainly could inspire >for band names OH! Wait! Wait! You forgot my favourite, Pig And Whistle, and in Swindon there is the Hobgoblin too, which I wanted to take a peek in just because of the name. Sorry, just had to throw those two in there. Take care everyone, Cheryl 6 days and counting...
------------------------------ From: "Kerry Chicoine" <KERRY-N-MARV@worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: Nonsuch Sucks? No Way! Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 20:08:07 -0500 Message-ID: <01be9113$9399f820$LocalHost@default> pq ribber wrote: >At least, I say, it didnt outright suck, like Nonesuch, which, to this >day, I am sad to have to admit, I play periodically, trying to find >SOMETHING I like, and fail. Oomph! I feel like I've been punched in the stomach! My dear sweet fellow human, what is there *not* to like about a polished gemstone such as 'Humble Daisy'? It's Andy's all time best song IMO! Although I really love its earlier counterpart 'Ladybird' from the Mummer album. OMBEAN1@aol.com wrote: >Someone mentioned " I Cant Own Her" as a low point of AV1. WHAT? Listen again. Exactly! I'm not kidding, I *cried* like a big fat baby for the first 25 times I heard that song. I think 'I Can't Own Her' is a landmark recording, one that raises the pop possibilities higher than heaven itself! It's a fantastic song and one I'll be aspiring to emulate for as long as I continue to write... Lemon curry? KK
------------------------------ From: fsolans@carat.fr Message-ID: <80256761.0030BBD3.00@lns019.carat.fr> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 10:10:32 +0100 Subject: Coucou le revoilou Salut a tous, Chalkeurs and bad luck for you all proud defenders of Mother Grammar : after a lurker time, the English Language murderer is back ! Well. AV1 is a two months baby now, and it grows up very well, thank you. At least one listening per day at work, and not a boring second : without any doubt, it's an XTC record. Now my religion is done : never more the demos before the release. With the seven years, it was ok for this time, but I want to come back to the real hurricane of a virgin d-day. XTC's work deserves that. The real AV1's shock occured to me three years ago, when ROO stuck me to the ceiling, when KISK and ET gave me tears and lump in my throat, when GM burnt my brain. Feelings at the release were also strong, but without comparison and mainly due to the three songs not already known (HF, my fave, and Colin's). Honestly, if I had a preference for few of the demos immediatly after the first CD listening (only details), it's not the case now. When I'm listening the demos today, it's seems to me far from the perfection of AV1. And I think waiting it's a better proof of respect for an artistic work, wait it in its definitive form, exactly like the author want to deliver it. I believe that Andy is always angry with our pre-listening coming from diverse source, and I'm completely understanding him. If you have any cre ative activity or if you know people who have, you will meet very few of them who like to show their rough-works before the complete. It's different when you are a close friend, but in this case, I'm very far to be an XTC's close friend, so I will wait the real stuff and I have all the time to listen the demos after. Those who disagree can kill me now, j'ecris l'anglais en le burinant a la serpe ce qui me laisse peu de moyens de reparties. Cela dit, n'entravant que pouic quand ca se corse, ca me fait le dos large en matiere d'amour-propre ecorche, so come on folks ! Some news from around here. According to Musidisc (french distributor for CV), AV1 already sold more than 14.000 copies, which is the top score for an XTC record in this country. Excellent trend. But as usual, very rare airplay. After some articles and media celebration around the release date, XTC is back to anonymity. ET single isn't release here (v'got an import and it's a funny thing). For all french spoken, Arsenic et Vieilles Querelles is at last avalaible, it's a mavelous miracle. My friend Philippe Bihan fills all our fan's hearts with his amazing job. In spite of ridiculous meanings, the book looks wonderful, great story, great learnings, a real fan must have that in his hands at least one time in his life. Philippe has taken an half-hour on main national station France Inter, invited by Bernard Lenoir (our national John Peel, and huge fan) to present his book. It was positively an exquisite moment. Only three songs in 30 minuts, cause the men discuss a lot and time was quickly overpassed (here we're all knowing that long nights and passionated days are requested to speak correctly about XTC...but this is not exactly the national station POV !). So it was thirty minuts, not one more, ...but each was great. Maybe ones of the hundred young ears listening will take their ticket for XTCland after that (hope). Sgt Pepper ? at the begining, no interest. Then it was a good time to take a look back. I'm a last child, with big backgrounds from parents - Georges Brassens, Django, Louis Amstrong, Nat King Cole (spanish era) Frederic (yes, it's why) Chopin.... - from my sister six years old more - Beatles, Bowie, Simon & Garfunkel, Neil Young....- and finaly from my brother three years old more, all that mixed in the household sound machines. My broz introduced me in my two teen engagements, apparently opposite : Genesis first, with Trespass, and all their stuff where the Lamb culminated (and Yes, and Jethro Tull, and ....), The Stranglers years later, with The Raven (and XTC, and Clash, and Talking Heads....). From this time, early 80's, I made my own background, most of the time on the same line with my broz. All along, XTC was permanently first of all. I met reggae with Sandinista, and Marley and LKJ and..... I met only two real Top Band from the rock area the ten last years, Pixies and Radiohead, more hundred bands for the airplay and lot of feelings. I met musics from all around the world, groovy things, amazing sounds, others feelings. And finaly, from the begining to now, there is no opposite : strong voices, strong players, strong styles, strong rhytms, dedicated to melodies and dissonances. til the end, it will be my formula. Well, enough. (pour ceux qui n'arrivent pas a digerer la bouillie, evitez-moi la prochaine fois) Fredo Fat Bassman What ? a third GEGGY TAH soon ? well, with Fuzzy Warbles, kind of thing will feed me waiting for AV2
------------------------------ Message-Id: <3.0.32.19990428091227.00dd6680@cam-mail1.cambridge.arm.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 09:12:29 +0100 From: Adam Parsons <Adam.Parsons@arm.com> Subject: Other Albums Hi all, I've been lurking for a while, and now feel I could make a (trivial) contribution to the list. Regarding the 'No Thugs....' discussion, the 'boy in blue' is definitely a policeman. When people started on about it being his brother, I thought I'd missed something deep and obscure - now I'm convinced it's just the regular use of a very common English expression! Have any XTC/ex-XTC members done any solo albums? I'd be interested in trying to get hold of any of their other work. I have 'Chips From the Chocolate Fireball', so know about the Dukes, and I've got The Colonel's 'Too Many Cooks in the Kitchen' single - was there ever an album from him? Any other details would be appreciated. Thanks, Adam.
------------------------------ From: "Nigel Doran" <n.doran@farn-ct.ac.uk> Organization: Farnborough College of Technology Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 11:23:47 GMT+0 Subject: Partridge Power Message-ID: <1389E665EB5@library.farn-ct.ac.uk> Dear Chalkers Just an example of how the songs of Mr. Partridge can have an effect on the subconscious. I'd liked a girl for ages, but was getting nowhere slowly. Then on my nightly walk to the pub where we both drink, I stuck an XTC compilation I made into my walkman. Terry's funky drumming on SGT. Rock took me in, and hypnotised me. I ended up playing it 5 times, every night for a week, and the line' Sgt.Rock is going to help me. Make the girl mine...' stuck in my head. With the good seargent holding my hand, I made my move, and it worked! Cheers Andy, youre an inspiration. Have any other fans had any life enhancing experiences because of an XTC track Cheers Nigel D 'Do what you will but harm none'
------------------------------ From: "Andy" <Plysadh@nottingham.ac.uk> Organization: The University of Nottingham Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 13:05:01 GMT0BST Subject: Re: Bloody Boys In Blue Message-Id: <E10cT5Z-00033H-00@nottingham.ac.uk> Please listen to Dom, the overwhelming concensus amongst us englishfolk should have convinced you by now. Besides, Andy calls the policeman boy because that is the expression, whether you like it or not - "boys in blue". Why the bloody hell does graham need a younger brother anyway, what part in the plot could he play? Andy
------------------------------ Message-ID: <19990428123630.93002.qmail@hotmail.com> From: "jonathan monnickendam" <monnickj@hotmail.com> Subject: matt kaden Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 05:36:30 PDT Has anybody have a current e-mail address for this man ? I just wanted to get in touch. appreciated jon
------------------------------ From: Chauncy14@aol.com Message-ID: <fbf47795.24586a8b@aol.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 09:43:39 EDT Subject: Gregsy's business with the other Two? Hey XTC Cllan ~ <Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 13:11:40 -0500 From: Mitch Friedman <mitchf@mindspring.com> Subject: new Dave news> Wrote in regards to a letter from Dave: <"Another busy week ahead - two more days at the Townhouse Studios with Miss Finland (well *someone's* gotta do it) - then business to conclude with The Other Two Guys."> If you don't mind me asking, what is the *business* Dave refers herein, to conclude? John Gardner Chicago
------------------------------ Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 02:22:01 -0400 Subject: Re: The Last Hurrah Message-ID: <19990428.022229.15838.1.BrainiacsDaughter@juno.com> From: Elizabeth I Spencer <brainiacsdaughter@juno.com> Er, well Pacific 707--how do I put this??? I don't know if you're the *only* one, but I'm sure few of us believe AV1 to be the band's "last hurrah." Though I had a bit of a hard time with the disc intially, I've come to see and hear it for what it is. And what it is, is gorgeous. Mr. P. has always talked about pushing out at the edges of the pop balloon, (without actually popping it,) and isn't that one of the biggest reasons we love what he does? If we never got anything but Black Sea Redux, we never would have had Snow Man, or Me and the Wind, or 1000 Umbrellas, or well......you name it. Digging this band is about digging growth. And that means respecting the changes in the band, because on some level we understand and connect with it. When they change, we're invited along for the ride. And, oh Gawd, am I glad I said yes! Come on. Andy's got kids. I'm sure the white pants with the arrows don't fit him anymore. Give the disc an honest listen. I swear, the maniac-genius you know and love is still right there. Liz Spencer
------------------------------ Message-ID: <19990428153518.78527.qmail@hotmail.com> From: "Megan Heller" <hellerm@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Are You Being Served? Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 08:35:18 PDT [No XTC content, but at least this means I won't be arguing about "No Thugs in Our House"] [I always thought it was very obvious that it was a policeman, and I'm American and was twelve when I bought the album] Many moons ago, (I believe) Huw Davies asked-- >BTW Why do Americans like Are You Being Served so much? To me it >represents all that is bad about British TV. I actually brought up this discussion in my class on Theoretical Approaches to Literary and Cultural Studies (say that five times fast) yesterday. We read an article by John Fiske called "the Popular Economy," which talked about why certain shows are popular in certain cultures, especially homogeneous shows. On of his examples was the show "Dallas," which, in its day, was one of the most popular shows in the world. Now, it's easy (and very Frankfurt School) to say that it's just a matter of people being dupes to the system. Fiske, and other ethnographers, argues that it has more to do with what is brought to the show by a particular culture-- for example, a study showed that there were Marxists who liked "Dallas" because they believed that the show was actually subversive, mocking the captialism it seemed to celebrate. We started talking about the fact that Americans seem to think that everything that comes out of Britain is cultured and intelligent. This means every British comedy is "clever," including "Are You Being Served?". (We also discussed the fascination with every period film that comes out of Britain, but that's another matter.) On the other hand, some other students who has been to England for a period of time noticed that violence and stupidity seemed to be associated with the United States. For example, one girl mentioned watching a play in London called "Popcorn," which depicted Tarantino-style violence and American characters (over here, an American playing a Brit is usually playing a "cultured" character). My roommate lived in England for a while, and she mentioned hearing a radio ad for a British product in which the speaker was supposed to be a bit backward, and the accent used was distinctly American (leaning towards Texan). SO...do Americans just think the English are smarter (despite Benny Hill and the Teletubbies)? Do the British think Americans are violent and stupid (and are they right)? I'd be interested in hearing views on this matter, especially in media terms. megan.
------------------------------ Message-ID: <A5JVlTA$UiJ3IwXr@coopefamily.demon.co.uk> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 21:59:43 +0100 From: KT <Katy@coopefamily.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: An observation In article <19990424.040229.3486.1.MollyFa@juno.com>, mollyfa@juno.com writes >Well, I just found an old tape I taped off of MTV (when it was still >cool), and I found Dear God. I was watching, and I noticed something >that I've never noticed before. The scene where Andy sings, "And the >devil too", and he's playing with his fingers, I never noticed that he >was in the tree. I had to go back and rewatch it to see if I was right. >He looks so evil when he says that. =o) Yeah, I saw that (although on a crap tape >.<) That is the main reson why I like that vidio so much, we're talking even more evil looking that robbie williams.. me like n.n oh, BTW, like dom said, A BOY IN BLUE IS A POLICEMAN!! -- KT Coope
------------------------------ Message-ID: <NJdWpWAsYiJ3IwV6@coopefamily.demon.co.uk> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 22:03:40 +0100 From: KT <Katy@coopefamily.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Little Boy Blue In article <199904271645.JAA49371@mando.engr.sgi.com>, owner- <chalkhills@chalkhills.org> writes >> I think that "boy in blue" actually refers to the policeman, so >> there would only be *one* son. I think this may be another of those >> uniquely British phrases that has caused some confusion. > >Policemen wear blue here too, although they aren't called "boys". yeah, bear in mind it is the WHOLE TERM boy in blue, that means Policeman >Do you say "cop" in Britain? That seems like a very American word to >me. Yeah, but only coz I'm a 'orrible teeanger. i've hear english policemen get rally pissed off if you call them cops though..though they get called coppers.. er..I'll shut up now. -- Katy Coope
------------------------------ From: Chauncy14@aol.com Message-ID: <1f5fb694.2458b14f@aol.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 14:45:35 EDT Subject: Tabla and the Time Passages! Hey XTC Clan ~ <From: dieling <lemoncurry@geocities.com Subject: Rhythmic peppers> >From Digest #5-155... Dated: Wednesday, 31 March 1999 Speculated: <Any Tabla players out there who don't get lost in 17/39 rhythms?> Mr. Lemon Curry ~ I have searched for weeks to find this reference you made, and I found it! Just a few comments: Re: getting lost in 17/39 rhythms...there is of course no such thing! Time Signatures are only divisible or a multiple of the numbers 2 or 3, on the upper number of the signature, which shows the number of beats. The bottom number is only divisible or a multiple of the number 2. Therefore, since 17 and 39 are prime numbers, and can only be divisible by themselves or the number 1, they are not a part of the time signature. Unless you were joking, that is the fact Jack! As for the Tabla, the rhythms are considered to be a *raga.* The actual instrument used in conjunction with a *sitar,* is the *tabla* or hand drum. These instruments, for those who aren't familiar with them, are most commonly used in India. In general, while listening to music from India, you usually hear the sitar, which is a stringed instrument, being played melodically, while a series of syncopated cross-rhythms is being played by a musician on a tabla. The drum rhythms are based on rhythmic units known as *talas.* A *tala* is a drum rhythm framework on which one or more drummers can improvise. This is a *layering* effect, on which there is one basic drum pattern, with additional layers of more drum patterns on top of the central theme pattern. The Grateful Deads' drummers did their drum solos on tom toms together based on this rudimentary framework, for example. Even *Roll away the Dew* has this twinge. There really is no connection between the Tabla and XTC's *Greenman,* but if there where to be one, I would say, that it can be said that they share a similar pattern or paragraphing. These patterns are called *ternary.* This term denotes a three-part musical form created by repeating a first section, after a contrasting section. A *bridge,* if you will. And that is it! There is no Tabla to speak of on this song....sorry! Now, maybe Andy and/or Prairie, together slapping their thighs in rudimentary fashion, is what you are hearing??? This brings up another song, ABACAB, by Genesis. This is a 6-part binary ternary. {I know, its' quite the pun! } Greenman is a five part binary, and if the keys were A - B - A - C - D, per part, then this would affectuate the pattern. When you listen to this song, ask yourself, *how many movements are there?* These are the simple structure of the song itself ~ how the song breaks down, down to the chord, verse and phrasing. The paragraphing, if you will. But, I am not certain of the key in which Greenman is played in, therefore, cannot comment on that. But Genesis's song *ABACAB* was based on the keys they were playing therein. Nothing more! I would reason that since XTC have had the habit of recording never more than they could reproduce live, in the early days, many songs in the catelogue are tunes which have keys that are 3 part, of simple binary structure, including some on AV1. Although some of it is clearly along different lines as stated above, the majority of the music has time passages which are within a 4/4 time signature. This of course says nothing about the meter of AV1 songs, and that is a whole new ballgame! I hope this helps, unless you were just goofing around! John Gardner Chicago
------------------------------ Message-ID: <618F91505D89D21185330001FA6A49548EACB9@HFD-EXCH008> From: "Witter, Karl F" <WitterKF@aetna.com> Subject: TV's glory days Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 15:00:31 -0400 >Why do Brits like "Three's Company" so much? Baywatch not invented yet, plus continued presence of Kate Jackson made "Charlie's Angels" too cerebral. Still watching Supertrain, Karl
------------------------------ End of Chalkhills Digest #5-186 *******************************
Go back to Volume 5.
29 April 1999 / Feedback